Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Hardman's avatar

"How do you know suffering is not to the human what the howl is to the wolf?"

Now there is an interesting concept. It gives a neat twist to Descartes' statement - "I think, therefore I am."

If humans are biologically inclined to obsessively use our logical minds to rationalize the tsunami of energies forming the Present Moment, is that the source of "suffering" that the Buddha cautions us about? Is this manic energy of suffering the impetus that makes life interesting and worth living?

I am reminded of a scene in Woody Allen's movie Annie Hall, when Paul Simon suggests that Woody needs to "mellow out" rather than being in a state of constant anxiety and suffering. Woody replies: "I don't do "mellow", I tend to rot instead."

I like Philip Shepherd's concept of dual consciousness centers - the logical head-mind and the sensual/emotional pelvic-mind linked by the vagus nerve. While the head-mind is a "myth", it is a very powerful one not to be denied. Can there be a dynamic balance between our capacities of logical thought and emotional sense? Yes, but our current social structures favor the "tyranny of the rational mind" over the wisdom of our intuitions. Only a brave few seem to have the grasp of the Moment sufficient to overcome our social programming.

Perhaps our addiction to rationalization and accompanying anxiety/suffering is the jolt of energy needed to transcend our disembodied stupor of sensory deprivation from our discarded perceptions from our bodily senses and emotions. Does the wolf howl to feel alive or simply because it is alive? That difference is the human dilemma.

Expand full comment
Tawsif Ahmed's avatar

A much desired dose of epistemic humility. I look forward to it like cough syrup now - no longer bitter, just refreshing.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts